Shejrho Dar Borai Zaboni Modari

Har yak shahrvandi tojikiston vazifador ast,ki zaboni modari- tojikii khudro guromi dorad. Dar haqiqat ruzi 2. 9 ki ruzi qabuli qonuni zabon baroi har yaki mo ruzi faomush nashavandaast. Har kas ba zaboni khud sukhandon gardad, donistani sad zabon oson gardad. Ba zaboni modari khesh sadoqat va muhabbati bepoyon doshta boshem,zero,ki ehyoi zabon purarzishtarin merosi mo ba naslhoi oyanda.

That was interesting. Did you translate it yourself? Electronic instrumentation by hs kalsi 3rd edition pdf free download. Edit listview subitem in vb6 source safe.

Monzem (Munzim) had been ordered by the Soviets to write this poem prior to the alphabet change in 1929. They wanted to uproot whatever Persian and Muslin in the country. It didn't take longer than 10 years to realize that Latin was not convenient enough either. Because Iranians and Afghans could understand it easily. That's why they decided to Russify it in 1939. Other than the historical argument - not losing our link to the past - which may not be valid anymore (converting all old texts to new alphabet can be computerized). There is one strong argument in favour of keeping the alphabet: because the differences in accents between Tajik-tajikistan, tajik-Afghanistan, Persian-Tehrani, and Persian-Isfahani, and so on.

H aving Arabic alphabet erases all differences and promotes the unity of the language. We with all write in the same way but read with slightly different pronunciations!! The ancient Persians and their brothers used also 'semtic', proto-arabic writing scripture (arameic). I do not cara about the alphabete but about the vocabulary. Maybe someone of us is very smart and develope a new alphabete? I am against latin because we have different (including old iranian dialects ->soghdi) dialects and if we write in latin we won´t understand eachother.

Turks in turkey have often this problem. In that case arabic do not know such a problem. Arabic can have 1000 different dialects but everywhere you can see they write the same phrases with the same letters. [quote=Parsistani;6597]The ancient Persians and their brothers used also 'semtic', proto-arabic writing scripture (arameic).

I do not cara about the alphabete but about the vocabulary. Maybe someone of us is very smart and develope a new alphabete? I am against latin because we have different (including old iranian dialects ->soghdi) dialects and if we write in latin we won´t understand eachother. Turks in turkey have often this problem. In that case arabic do not know such a problem.

Arabic can have 1000 different dialects but everywhere you can see they write the same phrases with the same letters.[/quote] I doubt there is any need to create a new alphabet. The existing Perso-Arabic will do. All our forefathers have been using it and we don't need a division between us and them. We've seen it already twice in Tajikistan. Results are horrible. Thus perhaps we should keep what we have.